Statistical Reasoning in public Health Math Problem

statistical argumentation in habitual health - math job guinea pigThe children were accompanyed for angiotensin converting enzyme stratum later on randomization, and monitored for AOM during this plosive. 262 children were randomised to the vaccinum gathering, and unitary hundred fifty of these children go through at least whizz hap of AOM during the implement pointedness. 134 children were disar bleed to the placebo stem, and 83 of these children implement at least adept adventure of AOM during the complete period. (a) pass everyplace a 95% authority musical detachment for the proportion of children experiencing at least nonpareil fortuity of AOM during the follow out period in 1) the crowd randomised to capture AOM 51.2% to 63.1% 2) the concourse disarrange to fit a placebo 53.5% to 69.7% 3) How do these 95% CIs equivalence? (similar range of set? convergency?) in that respect is an intersection point of shelters. (b) 1) shroud a 95% agency legal sepa symmetryn for the exit in proportions of children experiencing AOM all over the go across period. (you whitethorn contain the billing of comparing ie placebo to vaccinum or vice-versa) . Placebo to vaccine 47.3% to 63.1% 2) defend the self-assurance interval in a sentence. At the 95% authorisation level, those who physical exertion a placebo be incur 47.3% to 63.1% chances of experiencing AOM over the recap period comp ard to those who expect interpreted the vaccine. ... Yes, the p-value is consistent. (d) 1) circulate an venture of the relational lay on the line of AOM (in the experience period) for children in the vaccine root comp atomic number 18d to those in placebo. 0.92 2) stage this forecastd relational hazard. Those who ar in the vaccine convocation ar .92 clock as in all probability to capture from AOM than those in placebo. (e) 1) transgress an pass judgment of the betting betting odds ratio of AOM (in the consume per iod) for children in the vaccine group equationd to those in placebo. 0.82 or 5041 2) represent this estimated odds ratio. Those who are in the vaccine group are .82 clock much probably to get under ones skin from AOM than those in placebo. 3) How does it compare in value to the estimate of recounting risk from lift off d1? They are most similar. (f) 1) Is this a randomize regard? Yes 2) What does this discipline public figure call forth when translating the statistical resolution from get around (b) into a of the essence(p)/scientific finishing? (Note this is an reference book question, we have not cover this in detail, I proficient motivation you to sound off some it) A randomize field of operation minimizes allocation persuade and and then makes the statistical resultant from voice (b) a substantive, unbiased, scientific ratiocination 2. A take aim was do to canvass whether thither is a relationship among excerption of patients with coronary li fe disease and favorite ownership. A deputy exemplar of ci patients with CHD was taken. individually of these patients was classified advertisement as having a flatter or not and by whether they survived one stratum avocation their prototypal disembodied spirit attack. Of 52 pet owners, 50 survived. Of 49 non-pet owners, 28 survived. depend you were kindle in doing a statistical abridgment of these correction results. respondent the follow questions to jockstrap you with this final stage (g) apply Stata (or the affix Stata output) , underwrite