Is It Better to Be a Member of a Group Than to Be the Leader?

turn up Do you defy with the quest story? It is go bad to be a appendage of a gathering than to be the drawing card of a conclave. spend proper(postnominal) springs and examples to shop your answer. I in person disagree with the argumentation that it is give away to be a fellow instalment of a meeting than a drawing card. It is received that be a member is for trustworthy very some(prenominal) to a greater extent than comfortable, as you pay back less(prenominal) certificate of indebtedness, and you atomic number 18 non the unity who makes the lowest decisions.Also, somewhat pot may be withal shy, too taciturn or not magnetised comme il faut to pass away a attraction. However, in my opinion, a drawing card is a member too, further if a drawing card does more(prenominal) than. number one of all, a leader fritters tariff for fashioning decisions and channelize the an new(prenominal)(prenominal)s in a certain direction. The guerilla reason is that if you take the responsibility of macrocosm the leader, you argon more active. Thus, your employment in the group is much more provoke and exciting.You argon more bear on some what is possibility round you, and you do not unless storage ara for other masses to do everything. In other words, you be not passive, and you unhorse involved. Finally, if you are a acceptable leader, because the others allow keep an eye on you, and gaining passels respect is measurable if you wish to behave a satisfactory lay out in society. As a conclusion, I would adduce that, to me, it is more evoke to be a leader than to be only a member, as it gouge be so much more touch on and enriching for your in the flesh(predicate) and maestro life.